Sun Sedge, Old Friend

Once upon a time spent many hours lying on my belly in the prairie counting and identifying the stems in little quarter meter square worlds. In the Flint Hills of Kansas, one of my most ubiquitous fellows was sun sedge, Carex inops ssp. heliophila, which was often only outnumbered in stem count by little bluestem or prairie dropseed (which were beasts to count). Usually by the time of my first sampling in May signs of flowering and fruiting had faded, but it could still be reliably identified by it’s pale green foliage relative to Mead’s sedge (Carex meadii) and long-rhizomatous nature…also the absence locally of very similar-looking Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pensylvanica), of which it was once considered a variety (var. digyna).

I’ve been looking for sun sedge for eleven years now in Wisconsin, and it has not been easy, because Pennsylvania sedge is everywhere, and some floras give the field botanist little to by in terms of separating the two, in some cases it’s just a perigynium size cut-off, and in some of those cases it’s optimistically too small (1.5mm wide, when Pennsylvania sedge at the high end can be 1.7mm wide). Mature enough perigynia to assess are also only held on the plants briefly in late spring. Last spring I made targeted visits to some prairie remnants near an old collection site for sun sedge, and I came up empty…well one of the sedges on one of the prairies was probably it, but the perigynia were not yet ripe enough to make a slam dunk case.

Later last year I spotted a rhizomatous, vegetative sedge on a tour one of my favorite dry to dry-mesic prairies (nice because of very frequ]ent, very early spring burning…vs. middle April or after), and thought that it just might finally be sun sedge. I stopped by again in April to find the sedge flowering. I knew it when I saw it because there is a decent field character for separating sun sedge and Pennsylvania sedge apart from the perigynia, it’s foliage is held more stiffly erect, whereas Pennsylvania sedge has flexuous foliage. On top of that, the most distal staminate scales were relatively acuminate. So it was worth going back. …but I needed perigynia for proof, so I went back on 5/16 and hit it at the perfect time. Below are some images of sun sedge and contrasts with Pennsylvania sedge.

Carex inops flowering in April on a southern Wisconsin prairie. Looks a lot like Pennsylvania sedge, doesn’t it? On this date bird’s-foot violet, wood betony, and sand cherry were also blooming.
Mature sun sedge. This image shows several features that distinguish it. First, note how its pale blades are erect, not nodding. While less evident in early growth, the blades are also relatively stiff when young. The other is the perigynia, which are relatively large, especially in their width, and also their tendency toward longer beaks. Pennsylvania sedge perygina only have little nubby beaks. I also think their might be a color difference in the mature peryginia (more golden in sun sedge), but that remains to be seen.
Flexous foliage of Pennsylvania sedge. Note how the blades arch and aren’t held vertically.

Sun sedge perigynium. The largest should be about 2mm wide or wider, especially considering there will be slight shrinkage upon drying (most keys are based on dried herbarium material). They will shink less width-wise than length-wise (maybe 1 tenth or two of a mm).

Mature (readily disarticulated) sun sedge perigynium top and Pennsylvania sedge (bottom). Note that this Pennsylvania sedge peryginium was 1.5-1.6mm wide, so perhaps ambiguous or misleading in some keys, but still narrower in measurement with a shorter beak (once any retained stigmas are knocked off).

Mature sun sedge (left) and Pennsylvania sedge (right).

Sun sedge is mostly a species of dry to dry-mesic prairies, meadows, and open savannas. Some woodland populations might persist with succession to more closed conditions. It occurs in a variety of soils, but eastward it is apparently more often in sandy soils. The spot where I located it was a mixture of sand and gravel (mostly dolomite). Pennsylvania sedge can be found in prairies too, but usually those in close proximity to historical savannas and woodlands, so sedges in historically wide open prairies deserve more scrutiny.

Posted in biodiversity, ecological integrity, native plants, Prairie, Sedges | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sharing “The Persistent Threats of Dominance and Hierarchy” by Justin Thomas in the Missouri Natural Areas Newsletter

Find the essay here.

As beings we would all benefit from slowing down, listening, and meeting the land where it is with “engagement and awareness.”

What does this expression say to you? Loving is listening.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Growing Season Burns

Burns occurring now are clearly growing season burns. The spring flora is well underway. Bumble bee queens are about. For reasons given in a previous post, most of these burns, especially those occurring in remnant natural communities, will do more harm than good in the long term. They will destabilize versus stabilize. It’s a shame, because we had a surplus of good burn days in between late October and late March–at least 25 in February and March. This year I think we entered a caution period on about March 15 that went until about April 10. Ideally those burns would have happened earlier, but they were probably OK-ish. Now is clearly late.

Growing season burns in natural communties have short and long-term effects that contribute to the misconception that fire is not effective or healthy. I know it’s hard to get enough fire on the ground, but nature doesn’t care about our convenience. It just responds how it will. We need to adjust.

WDNR planned burns from 4/13 on their prescribed fire dashboard. Some of these are in state natural areas. They aren’t the only ones burning. These burns are well-intentioned, and those involved face very tough constraints/choices, but the grim reality is that most of these sites won’t maintain their ecological integrity if we don’t burn enough, and they won’t maintain their ecological integrity if we burn this late. With the level of resources society is willing to allocate to conservation, especially land management, I think, the footprint of our “protected” resources far exceeds our capacity to maintain.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment